Figure ground relationship in painting and gemmary

figure ground relationship in painting and gemmary

Type 2 sequencing of the legend and the link between it and the figure The . and the signature of the engraver under the ground of the subjunctive vivas, that is . aspects of Late Antique the interesting point is the particular reversal of the Z ; .. see: M.C.J. Miller, 24 T. Cadès, Impronte gemmarie dell'Istituto, Rome, , . relationships between the families for three ground, one arm numb beneath him and the other held almost as way is the mood of this painting similar to the mood of the story? Analyzing affect our view of characters and plot events and shape the tone of the story as a and gemmary, Fortunato, like his countrymen. CONSTRUCTING THE THESIS AND ARGUMENT – FROM THE GROUND UP . students' experience; explore through reading and writing the relationships between writer, text, and .. Many students first figure out what they want to say and then (and only In painting and gemmary, Fortunato, like his countrymen, was a.

Surrounding legend the halo as one can see on a 4th-century ad medallion of parts Type 1: Surrounding legend Type 1: Here the inscription, as on the Vienna garnet, is inscribed in two lines but respecting the direction of reading: It concerns a marriage pledge in which the names of the husband25 and wife26 are mentioned. In fact, as I will discuss below, the interruption of a clockwise reading of the inscription especially for Type 2 tends to indicate a modification in the Plate 7 Silver disc cast with bust of Plate 8 Silver disc with a draped meaning of the whole inscription.

figure ground relationship in painting and gemmary

Surrounding Finally, a 3rd-century ad agate in Naples Pl. Surrounding legend in legend Type 1: Type 2 sequencing of the legend and the link between it and the figure The next epigraphical configuration is very similar to Type 1: With this new type one finds nearly all the different kinds of legend noted above, 1. Type 3 but because of the space left free for the surrounding For the third epigraphical configuration, I will concentrate on inscription, the latter is sometimes more developed, and has a inscriptions written only in the lower part of the gem, and, for more complex structure.

Three examples will illustrate the the first time, with the letters facing inwards.

figure ground relationship in painting and gemmary

For now one may cite a 3rd-century ad cameo from the by another name in the genitive case and a word presumably in Content Collection, on which a slightly incurved inscription the dative.

Surrounding legend layers with bust of a woman. Surrounding legend in three with palm-branch as stop-mark Legend in exergue Type 3: Surrounding legend in two parts Type 2: Legend on each side of the portrait Type 5: Legend in exergue Type 4: The first, a portrait dating from the a lack of space in the exergue, her v v.

Figure–ground (perception) - Wikipedia

But the V is The second is a 5th-century ad cameo inscribed her vir v40 undoubtedly the beginning of vivas or vivatis as on a 4th- whose legend has been wrongly transcribed as Herrenia century ad silver disc said to have come from Hungary Pl.

Type 4 last part of which — designated as Type 7 — I will deal with The inscriptions, portraits of couples or families have their own below Pl. This was translated as the nonsensical plural keys to reading; therefore I will return to this in the next virgini Vestali — there is only one Vestale represented — instead section.

However, there is a small number of cameos on which of virgo Vestalis. The problem is knowing whether modeste is a the legends may be related to those of Type 3: Assuming the second difference between them is the use of a ground line to separate to be true, the whole legend should be translated as: The inscribed name is that of the figure, and in words are contracted in three letters and not the third, even the correct genitive case, the name of the owner as well.

figure ground relationship in painting and gemmary

It epigraphical configuration can also been found on a portrait would have been more logical to inscribe either her vir ves, in dating from the Imperial period. Monograms on each side of the left, facing female bust wearing female bust, draped, wearing a Related questions an upper reference point or punctuation mark Pl.

I shall introduce some more complex figure types, agate from Naples,65 for which, however, the symbol was a namely portraits of couples and families. The survival of such usage in the 9th century ad is demonstrated by a rock crystal intaglio 2. Monograms seal stamp of Lothar II of Lotharingia. Couples and families Type 6 Latin monogram, whose form is typical of the late 5th century These portrait types are interesting for several reasons. It is which is to read it as theodericvs for Theodoric the Great.

On a 4th-century ad silver disc with two nothing new on Late Roman gems Pl.

figure ground relationship in painting and gemmary

Christian symbols two portraits. Sometimes the choice is much easier when there Closely connected with monograms, we may address the use of are busts of two recognisable persons, but a legend which does Christian symbols such as the cross,57 Christogram Pl. One may take as an example a 4th-century ad jasper and staurogram59 on portraits.

Used to indicate that the bearer with the draped busts of Peter and Paul with a Type 3 Egyptian belongs to the Christian religion, they are also of a certain theophoric name inscribed below. On a silver inscription on a 2nd-century ad jasper,69 featuring a couple and disc of the 4th century ad featuring a couple,60 the meaning of referring also to the owner, shows that such an heterogenous the Type 2 legend in the vocative case is subordinated to a association was not specific to the Late Empire.

Christogram on each side of which there is an i and a n.

It is a Secondly, as gems and discs were often used as marriage wish: As on a 4th-century ad mosaic61 and other 4th- and ring of the 4th century ad. Surrounding legend in 14 x 14mm; 4th century AD pivot Type 2: Abbreviations and contractions 3. The first matter addressed will be an attempt to explain the meaning and specific arrangement of some initials on gems with group portraits, using the cases already met with as well as various archaeological parallels.

Firstly, on a 3rd-century ad carnelian intaglio Pl.

47 best figure/ground relationship images on Pinterest | Drawings, Paintings and Abstract art

The main difference between Types 2 and 6 is underline the Greek nature of the abbreviated legend. As an the inversion of the direction of reading between the upper and indication, one could mention the famous 4th-century ad Wint lower register.

Type 2, inscribed on the border, surrounds the Hill Bowl on the inner border of which an inscription runs image with letters turned to the outside in a single direction around the design in easily legible serifed capitals. In this case, too, the reversed Z underlines the the lower with letters to the inside. The palm- disc, each person is named by an abbreviated word76 with a branch at the end represents a punctuation mark, as on the Type 2 configuration of the inscription; but on a famous Naples agate Pl.

Indeed the letters above, N B line.

Figure–ground (perception)

On another Type 6 gem, a and N respectively. There are three defects: These anomalies could give us the impression that the with a break in the direction of reading as a new line, mentions intaglio had been manufactured by an engraver who was the signum82 common to the three persons. However, the letter forms are typical of the 4th century ad,93 and the reversed N is not exceptional: It is more likely the specific form of the tria nomina with a separate agnomen, 96 Plate 24 Carnelian intaglio drawing Plate 25 Glass paste with three a usage attested during the 4th century ad;97 the break in the with draped bust of Septimius busts, two with laurel wreaths.

By direction of reading serves to reinforce this possibility by Severus, laureate and crowned with the figures the letters: AVB reversed the modius, facing right between N; It is exemplified by a 4th-century ad nicolo from the Hermitage Pl. But, the first P, set vertically, breaks the reading direction and indicates that the bust too is that of the owner.

figure ground relationship in painting and gemmary

Likewise, a single letter inscribed in the same way can be directly linked to the figure it complements, as on a 4th- Plate 26 Silver disc with a female Plate 27 Brown carnelian intaglio century ad rock crystal featuring Paulus, or as on an earlier bust, wearing a hair band, facing a with bust of a young man facing example, a 2nd-century ad portrait from Paris Pl.

Legend behind the two a small child detail ; above, three figures, on each side of the gem whose legend presents Matidia as the personification of letters Type 1: Type 7 One last example, which demonstrates the use of Sometimes, as we have seen before with the 'Vestale' abbreviations to complement the figure: First of all, Euphemios and all nominative inscription.

So the letters are likely to be part either of nicolo in Vienna: The human visual system will then settle on either of the interpretations of the Rubin vase and alternate between them. Functional brain imaging shows that when people see the Rubin image as a face, there is activity in the temporal lobe, specifically in the face-selective region [4] [5] Perceptual process[ edit ] How does the brain decide in a visual scene which item is the figure and which are part of the ground?

This perceptual decision can be based on many cues, all of which are of a probabilistic nature. For instance, size helps us distinguish between the figure and the ground, since smaller regions are often but not always figures. Object shape can help us distinguish figure from ground, because figures tend to be convex.

Movement also helps; the figure may be moving against a static environment.

Color is also a cue, because the background tends to continue as one color behind potentially multiple foreground figures, whose colors may vary. Edge assignment also helps; if the edge belongs to the figure, it defines the shape while the background exists behind the shape.

But it's at times difficult to distinguish between the two because the edge that would separate figure from ground is really part of neither, it equally defines both the figure and the background. In this light, Bayesian figure—ground segmentation models have been proposed to simulate the probabilistic inference by which the brain may distinguish figure from ground.