5 facts about online dating | Pew Research Center
The internet is home to a wide array of websites create for a multiple of No matter which type of social networking platform you choose, it is. Be it in the form of a Coursera, Historypin, or Wikipedia, platforms have been . Marc Andreessen, “The Three Kinds of Platforms You Meet on the Internet,”. Andreessen, M. () 'The Three Kinds of Platforms You Meet on the Internet', cypenv.info Com, URL (consulted Jan. ): cypenv.info
Positive reviews bring social proof to your claims. Handled well, you can resolve issues with unhappy customers. Consumer review networks give people a place to review brands, businesses, products, services, travel spots, and just about anything else.
Reviews are a type of content that adds a lot of value to many websites and online services—think about the buying experience on Amazon, or the experience of searching for a local business on Google Maps. Consumer review networks take it one step further by building networks around the review as a core part of the value they provide. Location-based review services such as Yelp and Zomato continue to grow as personal social networks adopt geolocation and more users choose to consult the internet along with their friends for recommendations of best dining spots.
In fact, according to a survey by BrightLocal88 percent of consumers trust online reviews as much as a personal recommendation. To do this, you can select a customer success team member to address reviews on sites relevant for your business.
Entrust them with answering any questions or concerns from clients with average or negative experiences, and see if there is anything that can be done on your end to turn a possible detractor into a fan. For more on this topic, read our blog posts on how to respond to negative reviews and online reputation management.
The Different Types of Online Networking Platforms
Blogging and publishing networks Examples: WordPressTumblrMedium Why people use these networks: To publish, discover, and comment on content online. Content marketing can be a highly effective way to engage with your audience, build your brand, and generate leads and sales. Blogging and publishing networks give people and brands tools to publish content online in formats that encourage discovery, sharing, and commenting.
These networks range from more traditional blogging platforms like WordPress and Blogger to microblogging services like Tumblr and interactive social publishing platforms like Medium. Social shopping networks Examples: PolyvoreEtsyFancy Why people use these networks: To spot trends, follow brands, share great finds, and make purchases. Brands can build awareness, increase engagement, and sell products via new channels. Social shopping networks make ecommerce engaging by adding a social element.
Social shopping networks take it one step further by building their site around a focused integration between the social experience and the shopping experience.
Marc Andreesen digs into the Platform | ZDNet
Services like Etsy allow small businesses and individual crafters to sell their products without an existing brick-and-mortar location, and networks such as Polyvore aggregate products from different retailers in a single online marketplace, and. Most of the content is generated by users, who choose products they like, create collages, publish them as a set, and then share sets with other users.Free the Network: Hackers Take Back the Web
For more information about these networks and how they can benefit your business, see our guide to social commerce. GoodreadsHouzzLast.
To connect with others around a shared interest or hobby. Interest-based networks take a more targeted approach than the big social networks do by focusing solely on a single subject, such as books, music, or home design.
While there are groups and and forums on other networks that are devoted to these interests, focusing solely on a single area of interest allows these networks to deliver an experience tailor-made for the wants and needs of the people and communities who share that interest.
For example, on Houzzhome designers can browse the work of other designers, create collections of their own work, and connect with people looking for their services. The very binary design of APIs requires both the participation of an increasing number of developers and users as well as the inevitable elimination of intermediaries, go-betweens, or agents, on the other e. The rationale for the Seminar is, therefore, straightforward: If web platforms are indeed transforming the ways in which we communicate, find information, make purchases, and conduct research, they ought to be studied closely, especially when hard-won expertise is lost altogether — or, at the very least, lost in translation.
By enabling teachers, students and researchers to discover, analyze, and share information, collaborate without regard to barriers of space and time, and publish their work widely, such knowledge platforms uphold the fundamental academic mission to promote the discovery and dissemination of knowledge, yet they also raise questions about what counts as expertise, who controls access to information, whether quantification and metrics are being valued over humanistic knowledge and wisdom, the incursion of neoliberal ideologies that shift power from educational institutions to profit-seeking companies, and the loss of academic autonomy and diversity.
Given the speed with which web platforms are now being created, the Seminar is both timely and significant. Ultimately, Seminar participants will produce an edited collection of essays on the issues surrounding the production of, participation in, and politics around participatory platforms of knowledge. This endeavor will require a close exploration of consequences caused by the increasing reliance on these platforms; including the trend towards open access, changing conceptions of privacy and intellectual property, new ways of assessing scholarly productivity, and the development of interdisciplinary laboratory models of the humanities classroom, among others.
It will also make use of the very platforms under discussion to develop multifaceted interpretations of the changing face of academia. Although, in some sense, all Internet platforms involve managing information whether medical records, commercial transactions, or bureaucratic processthis Seminar will primarily focus on those that explicitly involve knowledge creation and transmission, that is, those that support education, collaborative research, public engagement in knowledge production, and publishing.
Cases to be Studied and Perspectives The Seminar will examine the proliferation of digital knowledge platforms from a variety of perspectives in order to understand their impact on culture and academia.
These perspectives will include interpreting the legal code governing knowledge platforms, analyzing their technological underpinnings, exploring their ethical implications, understanding their cultural history and significance, theorizing the production and consumption of knowledge through digital platforms, and examining the social groups that control, contribute to, and use these platforms.
We will consider platforms according to their functions, developer and user communities, core technologies, approach to openness, underlying business models, and frameworks for participation.
Among the cases to be studied are the following: While learning management systems such as Sakai and Blackboard may make it easier to distribute course materials, administer quizzes, support class mailing lists, and keep students informed about their grades, such systems have come under significant critique for focusing more on management than learning. Moreover, with the rise of learning analytics, which uses data from learning management systems and other sources to monitor student learning and identify opportunities for improvement, new concerns are emerging about privacy, reductive approaches to education, misinterpretation of data, and the costs of implementation.
Universities are using massive open online course MOOC platforms such as edX and Coursera to provide broad access to education, raise their profiles and develop insights into how people learn. University presses face significant challenges as a result of shrinking library budgets, declining university support, and the shift from print to digital. With the emergence of web-based publishing platforms, scholars are experimenting with publishing models that speed the circulation of research, make possible open peer review and discussion, and incorporate rich media.
- 5 facts about online dating
- The three kinds of platforms you meet on the Internet
- 10 Types of Social Media and How Each Can Benefit Your Business
For example, Scalar, an open source authoring and publishing platform developed by the Alliance for Networking Visual Culture, supports collaborative authoring, reader discussions, multiple navigation paths, and a range of embedded media formats including in partnership with archives.
Many open publishing projects face challenges in motivating and rewarding author contributions, performing quality control and validation, and finding viable sustainability models.
As open access mandates gain steam, enabled in part by dissemination of scholarly work through digital platforms, academics are protesting that academic freedom is being violated. Faculty also tend to resist such platforms largely due to tenure and promotions concerns. Seminar participants and visiting scholars will consider the implications of digital publishing platforms for shaping, disseminating, and discussing knowledge, examining their underlying assumptions about how academic knowledge is produced and validated, technical frameworks, and approaches to intellectual property.
The Different Types of Online Networking Platforms – Books are Life
As scientific research becomes more and more collaborative, collaborative research platforms have emerged to facilitate and provide tools for data sharing, to maintain communication within research teams, and to manage knowledge.
For example, NanoHUB provides a collaborative research platform for nanotechnology research, offering access to simulation tools, data, educational resources, collaboration space, and dynamic publishing capabilities. Efforts, such as Project Bamboo, to create cyberinfrastructure platforms in the humanities have run into challenges such as defining a clear focus, building and sustaining community, and managing collaboration.
Cyberinfrastructure platforms raise key questions: What motivates researchers to contribute to such platforms? How can these platforms be sustained?