Trade secret - Wikipedia
In business, you need to build relationships with a wide range of people, relationships that are vital to the future of your business, and define. Here are nine terms, from a relationship expert, that define modern dating. While you are not having a blown-out affair, your small, secretive. On the other hand, maybe it's okay to not to push your secret boyfriend to immediately “define” your relationship. Some people feel they have to tell the world.
No one sits down to take a test hoping to fail. No one shows up to a race hoping to lose and no one begins a meaningful relationship hoping to break up. Never again would I want to be the subject of those sympathetic gazes or questioning stares.
So I swore off things like social media when it came to my relationships and only informed a tiny circle of friends and family members that I was even seeing anyone. Anything to not have to deal with the shame of a highly visible breakup again. But after closely examining my behavior in relation to other people and my relationships, I began to wonder exactly what kind of relationship I was trying to have.
Business relations - Wikipedia
However, with social media outlets like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram making it possible for the average Joe to broadcast a message to hundreds, sometimes even thousands, of social media users with a few swift keystrokes, maintaining privacy in a relationship has become a rather challenging feat that requires a huge helping of self control.
But just how private should a relationship be and what happens when people become too good at keeping their relationships private? What happens when a relationship becomes so private that it becomes a secret? Though they initially played coy about their romance, after a few solid years of dating, establishing that strong foundation, and then jumping the broom, they eventually went public. Violation of the agreement generally carries the possibility of heavy financial penalties which operate as a disincentive to reveal trade secrets.
However, proving a breach of an NDA by a former stakeholder who is legally working for a competitor or prevailing in a lawsuit for breaching a non-compete clause can be very difficult. As a company can protect its confidential information through NDA, work-for-hire, and non-compete contracts with its stakeholders within the constraints of employment law, including only restraint that is reasonable in geographic- and time-scopethese protective contractual measures effectively create a perpetual monopoly on secret information that does not expire as would a patent or copyright.
The lack of formal protection associated with registered intellectual property rights, however, means that a third party not bound by a signed agreement is not prevented from independently duplicating and using the secret information once it is discovered, such as through reverse engineering.
Green Chartreuse liqueur protected by confidential information of the ingredients Therefore, trade secrets such as secret formulae are often protected by restricting the key information to a few trusted individuals.
Why is my boyfriend keeping our relationship a secret??
Famous examples of products protected by trade secrets are Chartreuse liqueur and Coca-Cola. The Coca-Cola company, for example, has no patent for the formula of Coca-Cola and has been effective in protecting it for many more years than the 20 years of protection that a patent would have provided.
In fact, Coca-Cola refused to reveal its trade secret under at least two judges' orders. Acts of industrial espionage are generally illegal in their own right under the relevant governing laws, and penalties can be harsh.
Thus, if a trade secret has been acquired via industrial espionage, its acquirer will probably be subject to legal liability for having acquired it improperly. The holder of the trade secret is nevertheless obliged to protect against such espionage to some degree in order to safeguard the secret.
Under most trade secret regimes, a trade secret is not deemed to exist unless its purported holder takes reasonable steps to maintain its secrecy. Arthur Schiller assert that trade secrets were protected under Roman law by a claim known as actio servi corrupti, interpreted as an "action for making a slave worse" or an action for corrupting a servant. The Roman law is described as follows: See Trade Secrets and Roman Law: The Myth Exploded, at The Myth Exploded that the actio servi corrupti was not used to protect trade secrets p.
Schiller is sadly mistaken as to what was going on. The actio servi corrupti presumably or possibly could be used to protect trade secrets and other similar commercial interests.
That was not its purpose and was, at most, an incidental spin-off. But there is not the slightest evidence that the action was ever so used.