Zora hurston langston hughes relationship

Zora and Langston | W. W. Norton & Company

zora hurston langston hughes relationship

Aug 4, Tailing Zora Neale Hurston and Langston Hughes across the South. excellent biographies of Hurston and Hughes, their relationship has. Dec 22, Langston Hughes and Zora Neale Hurston's friendship lasted five years beholden and with his creativity stifled their relationship deteriorated. Mule Bone: Langston Hughes and Zora Neale. Hurston's Dream and Zora Neale Hurston would actual- ly flesh out .. regarding the relation of literature and.

At any rate, in later years, none of them decided to take a legal action and go to the court. This is what we know at this point. It is rather difficult to return a verdict about this collision. From legal viewpoint, both of them have equal rights for this play.

zora hurston langston hughes relationship

Judging from their statements, Zora Hurston and Langston Hughes made equal contribution to the process of creation. Hughes wove a plot, singled out the main themes, created characters, whereas Hurston worked out almost each of the scenes and dialogues.

Langston Hughes & the Harlem Renaissance: Crash Course Literature 215

However, only a close analysis of their drafts can give a more accurate answer. Besides, we cannot rely on testimonials of their friends and relatives, as these people will always be biased against one of them. This conflict may also be discussed from a moral perspective because the behavior of the co-authors was rather controversial.

The Dispute between Zora Hurston and Langston Hughes

Almost any person would have been offended by such a statement and especially a writer. On the other hand, Hughes also made attempts to contact several stage directors and publishers, but he never asserted that he had been the sole author of Mule Bone Leach, p Apart from that, it was he who tried to restore their relations and continue work on Mule Bone.

So, to a certain degree, we can argue in his favor. But we do not know everything about their relationships and probably no one doesalthough some scholars believe their partnership was not exactly business-like and they felt deep affection for one another Hemenway, p It goes without saying that this interpretation of their dispute is based mostly on conjectures rather than facts.

10 July (): Zora Neale Hurston to Langston Hughes | The American Reader

On the whole, this is one of those situations when one side of the argument has to take a step toward reconciliation. Unfortunately, no one did it.

Of course, one can argue that Zora Hurston should not have been so inexorable in her unwillingness to see Hughes. Still, we have no right to accuse her of stubbornness because there is no accurate information as to what really happened between these people.

Such accusations may be erroneous in their core, as the true nature of their literary and personal conflict remains unknown to us. Elder Simms argues on Jim's behalf that a weapon is necessary to commit a crime, and nowhere in the Bible does it say a mule bone is a weapon.

10 July (1928): Zora Neale Hurston to Langston Hughes

Elder Childers, representing Dave, says Samson used a donkey's jawbone to kill 3, men citing Judges Joe Clarke declares Jim guilty and banishes him from town for two years. She tells him she's been worried about him, but he's skeptical.

She demonstrates the sincerity of her affection and Dave comes upon the couple. The two men engage in a war of words to try to show which of them loves Daisy more.

The Dispute between Zora Hurston and Langston Hughes

The contest ends when it becomes clear that Daisy expects her man to work for the white people who employ her. Jim and Dave are reconciled, and neither remains interested in courting Daisy.

The two men return to Eatonville. They wanted to write a comedy about African-American life that didn't consist of racial stereotypes. They decided to base the plot on a folktale Hurston had collected in Florida during one of her anthropological field trips. The two writers dictated their work to Louise Thompson, who typed it.

zora hurston langston hughes relationship

She took her notes and said she would return in the fall, and they could finish the play. When Hurston came back, she would not return telephone calls from Hughes.

She felt he wanted Thompson to be considered a third collaborator in the project, a proposal to which she strongly objected.